Home > BRICS, Global Finance, History, India, Indian Economy, Indian education, Indian media, Media, Politics, Social Trends > Jagdish Bhagwati lays out diaspora’s impact on India

Jagdish Bhagwati lays out diaspora’s impact on India


Why are we not grateful to The Great Indian Diaspora?

Why are we not grateful to The Great Indian Diaspora?

Indeed, over time, the flood of such stories coming from the diaspora helped lay the groundwork for the abolition of the senseless licensing restrictions on capacity creation, product diversification, on import competition, that became part of the liberal reforms.

In the case of Japan, its transformation through major initiatives throughout the Meiji era was accomplished rather by sending gifted Japanese abroad to bring back ideas that were adapted to Japan’s culture and needs. In our case, the diaspora has served that function.

But the diaspora has also contributed to India’s achievement of world-class status by its achievements in a variety of fields of science, arts and culture. Noting this growing trend in the United States, I once remarked that we were the next Jews of America: a high-achieving diaspora that would soon dominate the scene as the Jews, once discriminated against brutally, had managed to do. Today, that forecast has come true. (via Jagdish Bhagwati: Diaspora impact on a changing India).

I am not proud of diaspora’s success

Mr.Bhagwati – let me be honest (I usually try and also succeed, at honesty, I mean).

I am very happy for the Indian diaspora – where ever they have succeeded. You will also find that I am not proud of it – because we, the desis, had very little (if anything at all) to do with your success. And we, poor country desi bumpkins that we are , we should realize that – fast.

So, taking pride in the diaspora’s success is hypocrisy on our part. It is recognized by (many of) us, we desis, that we cannot and do not want to provide the means, infrastructure, capacity, rewards and recognition that the West provides to get the output that Indians have produced in other parts of the world. Only too happy with your success – and we should take no pride or credit for it. Period. We are also very grateful that you have decided to keep your Indian passport – and not exchanged it for another country’s.

No reminders … puhleeze

I will not remind you about the benefit of the highly subsidized English language education – for which India’s poor have paid through their nose. Only to find that the bird’s fly the coop when the time came (poor idealistic sods, these desis!). I would like to see how many of the Indian diaspora have succeeded in France, Spain, Portugal, Japan, Korea, Germany, Russia – or now China!

Coming to the Indian ‘success’. This great liberalization that you are going rah-rah about!

The Great Indian progress

The poor, landless labourer, remains poor and landless. Hardly any change. The only way he can get educated is, if he agrees to learn English! The Indian State does not allow private sector into education – and denies him education in the manner and medium that he is comfortable with.

Shh ... How can you point out such 'truths'!

Shh ... How can you point out such 'truths'!

Coming to business – the SME sector remains at the fringe, and over-burdened with a regulatory overload. The only people who have seen a reduction in regulatory overload is Big Business.

Anyway, let us not quibble. The Indian economy has become a force to reckon with – and we Indians can feel proud of that. With your permission, that is! Of course, if you feel, that we should not take any credit for this, and the diaspora remote-controlled that too, I will defer to you.

Behind the ‘success’

Poor country bumpkin, that I am, I need your guiding light. Can you enlighten me about your opening comment, when you say “Indian policy framework had degenerated into an unproductive, even counterproductive, set of policy choices that had produced the abysmal growth rate of approximately 3.5 per cent per annum over nearly a quarter of a century.”

I have only one troubling question. When you speak of ‘degeneration’, the logical question is degenerate from what? From the Colonial Raj policy framework? Or is it the Maratha or Mughal policy framework? Or is it the Gupta or Maurya framework.

Policy options before Bombay High

When you talk of “external payments crisis in 1991 was the occasion for changes that would systematically begin to discard the policy framework” my chanchal mind (curse it!) begins to wonder again. What choices did India have before the Oil discovery at Bombay High? With a flat -on-its-back industrial and agriculture sector, with low capital, with a starving nation, what options did India have? Before Bombay High? If you can kindly enlighten me with the policy choices that India had earlier?

After Bombay High, India could start cracking the whip. The 1977 Janata Government, with comfortable foreign exchange and grain reserves, could take some bold policy decisions. IBM and Coca-Cola walked out. My sluggish memory recalls George Fernandes doing something about this.

A chastened Indira Gandhi

In 1980, Indira Gandhi started with de-licensing the auto sector and the consumer goods sector. With declining dependence on oil imports, India had foreign exchange to invest in building a agricultural and industrial base. This gradual liberalization continued – in spite of many democratic regime changes. My desi,  mand and moti buddhi tells me that broadly this was something that India could manage. One may quibble or cavil – but broadly where were the choices? Am I missing something?

Post 1991, choices are there for all to see.

Where would India be without its entrepreneurs

The current respect that India gets is for two reasons – both home-grown. The Indian software success was entirely home grown – without multi-national inputs, technology, entities, funding. To grow from nearly 50 million to 50 billion in a matter of 20 years – is something that we desis will have to give credit to the diaspora, I presume. Narayana Murthy, Azim Premjee, Rajendra Pawar, Fakirchand Kohli are just presumptuous upstarts who do not know when to be grateful! They have should have banged their head at the altar of the Great Indian Diaspora! I agree, Mr.Bhagwati.

Same case with the pharmaceutical industry, also I presume. Parvinder Singh, Yusuf Hamied, all the pharma czars from Ameerpet, Hyderabad are taking credit, which should rightfully go the Great Indian Diaspora.

The Indian auto-component sector, which has given rise to the Bajaj, TVS, Tatas, Mahindras are again, I presume,  being unduly arrogant of their success. They should quietly give all the credit (not to mention the profits, control, shares) to the Great Indian Diaspora.

I can go on with this list – Shri Pujya Jagdish Bhagwatiji. But you are right. We should now go out and build four temples at the chaar dhaam to the Great Indian Diaspora without whom India would have been nowhere.

What ungrateful wretches, we desi Indians are!

Advertisements
  1. Galeo Rhinus
    January 11, 2010 at 4:30 am

    Here’s a rather acerbic response from an American NRI.

    Post 1947, India adopted a foreign polity. Over the years – the specifics of the adoption have changed – but to date it remains an imitation of western ideas of governance.

    In this premise – it will always remain a poor imitation. I cannot and will not subcsribe to the idea – that India can somehow “do better” than the nations it tries to imitate – as long as it’s polity remains founded in imitation.

    When Indians come to the US (or other western countries) they see how India is really “supposed” to be operating (again – remember – India “chose” to emulate western polity – it did *not* have to.)

    Given this context – the NRI offers something that Indian’s simply don’t have. Something they cannot have. An closer look at how the west operates within the context of its *own* polity and how India could do better a better job in imitating them. That is how us NRIs view “progress” and so do all of you who cheer India’s imitation of western polity.

    Why is that wrong?

    As long as India does not invent itself in its own identity – the NRIs – by mere proximity to the nations that India emulates – will be valuable advisors.

    *You* chose to copy western nations where we live – what is wrong in asking *us* – how you can copy the western nations better?

    (the subtext of this harsh response is simply to challenge “you desis” to invent yourself from your own experience – until then – “us NRIs” will always be perceived to be more valuable)

    🙂

  2. January 11, 2010 at 10:05 am

    I think You NRIs should read the swill that Jagdish Bhagwati writes – before You write Your own.

    You NRIs are more than welcome to be more /less/equally /slightly more /slightly less valuable (Look Ma! 5 point scale.) than anyone, including We ‘desis.’ I have no quarrel, no grudge, will not cavil, quibble, carp, criticize or find fault with that. All Your success is more than welcome to You. And I want no part of it – none at all.

    You couldn’t stand the heat, so You guys walked out of the kitchen. No sweat. No problems. Now, eat the food, quietly! Don’t try and tell Us that the food is good, because You guys had nothing to do with it! (And didn’t someone teach these NRIs not to talk, while having dinner).

    We (presumptuous, provincial, country bumpkins, the desi clods) owned up, and lived with all Our failures till now – and we are upto owning up to Our ‘successes’ also. And no, We don’t need help in carrying Our ‘burden of success’.

    When Jagdish Bhagwati starts claiming credit for my (really beat up) car, I will draw the line. In stone. My beat up car, was my own effort – and Jagdish Bhagwati and his ilk had NOTHING to do with it.

    I have some crazy notions. Better a beat up car in India, than a gleaming Merc or a Beemer anywhere else. I am an Anachronism, You say! Happy to be! And at Your service!

    And so it is, with all of Us ! We, presumptuous country bumpkins, the desi clods.

    We are like that only!

    PS – Bharat Mata Ki Jai

  3. January 12, 2010 at 6:20 am

    Mr. want to say that NRI offers INDIA a different outlook, its good But it will be good when they do more than this offering, giving comments , offering their outlook is not gonna do anything. Well better is expected from them.

    – India needs to come out of its licence Raj policies which are made by government just to extort money out from people. policies should be open, bars should be removed, that move has to be taken to move ahead from where we are right now.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: